South Africa considers £80 visas for Britons as diplomatic 'tit for tat' escalates
A British family of four planning a holiday to South Africa could be forced to pay an additional £320 thanks to proposals to introduce a visa requirement, which industry insiders fear could slash visitor numbers from its biggest overseas market.The announcement comes weeks after a diplomatic row erupted when Britain announced it would cut its £19m annual development aid to South Africa and is seen as a “tit for tat” move as the two countries’ relationship continues to sour.
In 2009 Britain revoked South Africa’s visa-free status amid concerns about the ease with which foreigners could obtain South African passports and corrupt home affairs officials.
South Africans are now charged R1,180 (£80) for visas – something that has been blamed for an almost complete drying-up of the traditional flood of young professionals spending extended gap years in Britain.
It has also caused bureaucratic headaches for visiting South African businessmen along with officials and diplomats.
South Africa has spent billions upgrading its passport with new security features and introducing a more stringent issuing process but the British visa rules have remained.
Naledi Pandor, the home affairs minister, told MPs last week that there had been “no movement” after talks between the two nations.
“We had been given a promise that following the (London) Olympics, there would be a focus on whether this visa requirement can be lifted,” she said. “There hasn’t been any movement and I think the time has come for us to consider reciprocity.”
Tourism insiders said Miss Pandor’s plan to charge visiting Britons was “hugely concerning” and symptomatic of the “tetchy” relationship that has developed between the two countries.
Last month, Pravin Gordhan, the South African finance minister, accused the UK Government of announcing its aid cut without prior warning to boost its chances in local elections.
One South African tourism chief said concerns by the British about South Africa siding with Russia and China in international debates on Syria, Libya and Burma might also have prompted a revision of the “special relationship”.
“The relationship is tetchy right now and then there was the bilateral slanging match over the aid cut,” he said.
“The British visa decision caused quite a bit of collateral damage. Many prominent South Africans going to the UK for sabbaticals were saying ‘to hell with Britain if that’s how they feel about us’.”
But others raised concerns about South Africa shooting itself in the foot with a “tit for tat” move. Britain continues to be South Africa’s largest overseas tourism market, with 438,023 British visitors last year.
“It is hugely concerning,” said one Cape Town-based tourism source. “South African needs to streamline visa processes and access to the country, not create barriers of entry for our visitors.”
“It would definitely have a chilling effect,” a spokesman for South Africa’s Tourism Ministry agreed.
Ronnie Mamoepa, the Home Affairs spokesman, denied that the minister was acting out of “frustration” at Britain’s failure to review its visa rules. He said any firm decision had to be approved by Cabinet.
“The original rule from Britain was not a good idea but states cannot act on frustration, they must act on principles,” he said.
“There are ebbs and flows in any relationship – it doesn’t mean South Africa doesn’t view the UK as a strategic partner but that partnership must be based on equality.”
A British Home Office spokesman said it continues to “work closely with South Africa to address immigration issues on both sides, improve our visa service and maintain the security of our border”.
I really, really, really, really hope this happens. Or that SA at least charges British visitors some amount of money for visa applications because what they demand SA passport holders pay is just ridiculous. Charging British passport holders a visa fee only seems fair. Plus, you could grant them a visa for a lengthy amount of time, such as a 10-year tourist visa, so the fee would eventually pay off and be worthwhile.
Yes and I hope other African countries follow suit
"I am not a racist, and I do not subscribe to any of the tenets of racism. But the seed of racism has been firmly planted in the hearts of most American whites ever since the beginning of that country. This seed of racism has rooted itself so deeply in the subconsciousness of many American whites that they themselves ofttimes are not even aware of its existence, but it can be easily detected in their thoughts, their words, and in their deeds."
Malcolm X
Taken from a piece written for the Egyptian Gazette, August 25, 1964.
(via disciplesofmalcolm)
my blog been sucking a lot so thanks for sticking around
"Be of service. You are taking your degree into a society dominated by concentrated poverty and a vulnerable middle class, a society where it is harder to pay for education, harder to find a job, harder to buy a house and harder to hold onto those things even if you manage to get them. You are entering adulthood during a period of mass incarceration and near constant war. There is a lot for you to do. Service is the rent you pay for the space you take up on the earth, and as a relatively privileged American you take up a lot of space. We are the most consuming, polluting, wasteful nation on earth. So your rent is steep. Pay it with service."
(Source: blackgirlsupremacy)
